Henrietta Lacks, a woman whose cells were taken without her consent, left a legacy that continues to impact the world of law and ethics. Her immortal cells, known as HeLa cells, have been at the center of numerous legal and ethical debates, shedding light on issues such as nationality laws in Bolivia and the availability of legal aid in Atlanta.

One of the most significant legal questions surrounding Henrietta Lacks’ story is the concept of informed consent and the bright line rules that govern it. The issue of whether a contract can be broken, such as in the case of selling a house, also comes into play, as seen in the legal advice provided by experts on real estate contracts.

Beyond the realm of individual rights, the story of Henrietta Lacks also prompts discussions about the national legal framework and how it can safeguard individuals from exploitation. The legal aspects of surrogacy, such as those seen in Nepal’s surrogacy laws, are crucial when considering the protection of individuals’ rights within this context.

Furthermore, the impact of Henrietta Lacks’ story is felt in the realm of occupational law and ethics. The 6 rules of SERE training provide essential guidelines for legal compliance, while the job description of a deputy business manager exemplifies the importance of legal and ethical considerations in various professional roles.